As an actor Kim Soo-Hyun continues to fight the accusations that surround an alleged relationship with the deceased actress Kim Sae-RonHis fans took things in his hand, launching a formal legal complaint against harmful commentators and voices spreaders online.
On April 22, the alliance of Kim Soo-Hyun fans, including the members of the Daum Cafe “Eucaris” and the Kim Soo-Hyun Gallery of DC inside, have announced that they are about to archive Criminal complaints against individuals who spread defamatory and false voices on the actor in online community and social media platforms.
Lawyer The TAE-Young from Siwoo Law Firmwhich represents the group of fans, said the complaint should be presented to Seongbuk Police Station By the week. According to the legal team, the accusations against these Netizen fall within defamation through the law on the network of information and communicationswhich allows third -party complaints unlike the insult accusations, which require the archiving of a direct victim.
In a rare global solidarity show, the initiative is supported not only by Korean fans, but also by Kim Soo-Hyun International Fanbase.
In an official declaration, the fans alliance said:
“This is a voluntary initiative to protect the actor’s rights and preserve a healthy fans’ culture “, The union said. “We will not tolerate personal attacks or comments harmful disguised as freedom of speech. There will be no clemency. “
The alliance revealed that it has collected large tests, including harmful comments, manipulated images and posts containing false statements that have circulated for months.
The Kim Soo-Hyun agency, a gold medal, presented a criminal complaint and a KRW cause (about 8.5 million dollars) against the family of Kim Sae-Sore and the YouTube channel Garo Sero for having released harmful voices. The controversy began after the statements that Kim attended Sae-Sra while he was a minor. Kim’s agency refuted this, stating that the relationship took place only after becoming an adult and Kim publicly denied any juvenile involvement.
As legal proceedings take place, this case continues to arouse a public debate on the privacy of celebrities, on the responsibility and role of the fandom in the protection of their idols.
