Newjeans’ members are prohibited by independent activities as the judicial injunction becomes definitive

Newjeans’ members are prohibited by independent activities as the judicial injunction becomes definitive

According to the legal community of 25 June, the five members of the Newjeans did not submit a re -appeal by June 24 against the decision of the Court of Appeal to support the prohibition of the composition as the entry of advertising contracts without the agency. A re -appeal must be submitted within seven days of receiving the court sentence.

As for this, the Netizen commented, “Idoli have a temporal window and are losing all that golden period”, “Bruvone Min Hee-Jin and go back, Lol”, “Seriously, as it came to this; pretending to be victims makes things only more difficult for real victims”, “So they can’t promote like Njz, right? It seems that they have already finished all the songs” AND “It doesn’t seem that they can even win the main cause: what do they even intend to do?”

Previously, on June 17, the civil division of the High Court of Soul 25-2 rejected the objection of the members to the initial approval of the Court for the injunction of Ador. This means that neither objection nor appeal by the Newjeans The members were accepted after the Court completely granted Ador’s request in March.

Newjeans-Legal-Battle-With-ADOR-Thumbnail

The appeal panel rejected the statement according to which the unfair audit of Hybe and the dismissal of the former CEO of Ador Min Hee-Jin undermined the basic premise of their exclusive contracts.

The Court said, “Since 2023 around 2023, the former CEO min has expressed dissatisfaction with the shareholders’ agreements, has requested reviews and has sought ways to bring Newjeans outside the control of Hybe or independent control for Ador. It seems to have taken a position that destroys the basic structure that unites Ador, mins and members.”

The Court also rejected the statements of the members, such as observation “ignores his” alleged member Hanni by another Hybe label director and the accusations of conceptual plagiarism – which had already been rejected in the first trial.

The director born in Hanni Illit 2001 resigns after the NJz controversy

The sentence underlined, “If the members of Newjeans unilaterally leave the exclusive contract and conduct independent entertainment activities, they could monopolize the results of their success, while Ador should have faced serious losses, losing all past investments.”

The Court did not recognize the prohibition as a violation of the rights of the members of work or artistic expression, affirming, “Even if the injunction is supported, the members of the Newjeans can still conduct entertainment activities as long as they respect the exclusive contract.”

In March, the civil division of the central district court of Soul pronounced in favor of the request for injunction by Ador, affirming, “Ador temporarily maintains his management agency status pursuant to the exclusive contract with Newjeans. The members must not engage in entertainment activities independently or through third parties without prior approval or consent of Ador.”

Newjeans Complexcon Court Fine AdrkPop-Group-Report-Singing-Stage.

Consequentially, Newjeans It is now forbidden to conduct any entertainment activities, such as lyric writing, performance, singing, transmission, events apparitions, commercial contracts and any other professional commitment, without ADER authorization.

Newjeans Previously he had held an emergency press conference on November 28, 2024, announcing their intention to leave Ador, citing unresolved internal problems. They declared that their exclusive contract would resolve on 29 November 2024 and that they would pursue independent activities.

Ador says that Newjeans violated the contract by opening unauthorized accounts

However, Ador claimed that the contract remained valid and intended a cause in December 2024 to confirm the continuous validity of the exclusive agreement. A month later, they submitted an injunction request that tried to block the members from the signature of advertisements or to act independently until the first test verdict was delivered in the case of the exclusive contract.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top