The Netizen react to the judgment of the Newjeans court: “₩ ₩ 1 billion KRW for violation? Is it crazy”

The Netizen react to the judgment of the Newjeans court: “₩ ₩ 1 billion KRW for violation? Is it crazy”

A recent sentence of the Court in the legal battle between Newjeans and their agency I love He unleashed an intense online reaction, in particular on the Korean forum Theqoowhere a post entitled “Newjeans’ injunction result” It has become viral.

According to the decision of the Court, Newjeans members are forbidden to engage in any entertainment activity outside the group or without Ador’s consent. Any violations will involve a file ₩ 1 billion KRW fine (about $ 726,000 USD) for accident, by memberA clause that immediately caught public attention.

The original poster also mentioned some of Netizens’ comments:

“A violation is equivalent to 1 billion KRW per member.”

“₩ 1 billion krw per person, per act – insane lol.”

The viral pole summarized the result of the composition and quickly became a hot topic, with thousands of points of view and flooded comments.

Newjeans Reging Retizens reactions reactions-Opinions-Opinions-Opinions-Opinions.

Comments on Theqoo:

  1. Wow, Lololol
  2. My group of prejudices also underwent an injunction cause for an exclusive contract, so I have always paid close attention to this type of case, but with Newjeans… honestly, it does not seem that they have a single Winnable point ㅠ even like that, most of the injunctions are partially accepted, but this is the first time that I see one completely rejected.
  3. The Bang Si-Hyuk stock problem, The Bang Vs. Min houses and adore vs. Newjeans The case are all separate issues, but some people connect them all. It starts from the date of service, so the Hong Kong case is not included. However, in ador-Newjeans accounts yield, Newjeans It has no possibility of winning.
  4. Oh, was this because of the Hong Kong concert? Their moves are so confused.
  5. UGH, what min Hee-Jin will do …
  6. Whatever happens, I hope it leads to a return.

The reaction reflects a growing concern for the Severity of the application of the Courtwhile the legal battle continues to take place. The injunction is part of an ongoing cause in which Newjeans Try to stop the exclusive contract with Ador, citing the violation of trust.

With the second hearing in the main cause provided for June 5thThe attention of the public remains fixed on the growing dispute and if Newjeans It will be able to recover artistic and professional independence.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top