The recent controversy that surrounds Kim Soo-Hyun and the deceased actress Kim Sae-Sore took a new turning point while the expedition reveals details that contradict the statements of his agency.
While the gold medal firmly denied the relationship, branding it as “false information”, many sources suggest differently. The tests and testimonies indicate that their love story was not only an unfounded voice, but an “open secret” in the sector.
According to the expedition, after studying the report from various sources, more testimonies align with the idea that their relationship was real rather than manufactured. A close knowledge of Kim Soo-Hyun revealed, “Due to the age of Kim Sae-S, recognizing the relationship has never been an option. “
This statement highlights the main reason why Kim Soo-Hyun and his agency have chosen to deny any romantic involvement with Kim Sae-Sign. At the time of their alleged relationship, the actress was significantly younger, making any public recognition potentially harmful to her career and reputation. As a result, their love story remained hidden, officially fired as unfounded speculations.
Despite their efforts to keep things private, their love story was an open secret within the clubs in the sector. However, when the report was unable to receive official recognition, Kim Sae-So-Sei found themselves carrying an unwanted label: “Love for oneself”.
The control intensified when, on January 8, 2025, the photos of the wedding of Kim Sae-Sore were abruptly eliminated after triggering speculation. The titles wondered if they were another moment of “love for oneself”, with the netizen wondering if there was more in history than with the eye.
Of course, it would be an excessive simplification to affirm that the secrecy and denial of this relationship led directly to the tragic disappearance of Kim Sae-Sore. Many factors have been at stake: a media control storm, speculative videos of YouTube, relentless public judgment, attempts to awaken the failed career and personal struggles. The burden of transporting these pressures undoubtedly has an impact on its well -being.
As the more details come to light, the persistent question remains: was the price of secrecy and denial was too heavy for Kim Sae-Sign to bear?
