The legal clash between the former CEO of Ador movie AND Music of subsidiary origin of Hybe intensified when Min Team of Min has challenged the admissibility of the controversial Kakootalk messages During a hearing in court May 30th.
THE 12th Civil Division of the Western District Court of Seoul He held the Second hearing in origin music ₩ 500 million krw (~ $ 363,000 USD) Damage cause against the min. The procedure saw only the legal representatives of both parties present.
The music of origin had scheduled a 20-minute presentation, but a few moments before the beginning, Min Hee-Jin Team objectedstating that the KakaoTalk messages included in the materials had been obtained illegally And it shouldn’t be admitted as proof. They also formally requested the process Conducted upon closed doors.
The Court recognized the objection, affirming:
“The accused expressed concern for the fact that some tests were obtained through actions potentially subject to criminal sanctions and therefore requested a closed audition.”
While the music of origin contested the objection, the judge issued a temporary sentence:
“We will proceed with a public audition, but we will limit any discussion or performance of the specific Kakaotalk extracts the competitions agreed up to further review.”
MIN’s team explained their main concern, “What worries us most is that the presentation can contain extracts of messages relating to the contested accident.”
In response, the judge gave music to Fonte the possibility of Review and reprogram the presentation. The music of origin rejected, “This same test was used in another case without problems. The objection comes too late and the delay is now unfair.”
The central legal debate depends on how Kakootalk’s messages were acquired. While The min Hee-Jin team claims that they may have been extracted illegallySource music maintains, “These messages have been accessible via company devices with prior consent. These are not private telephone hacking.”
The Court has scheduled a Separate hearing on June 27th specifically determine whether the KakaoTalk tests are legally admissibleA decision that could have a significant impact on the broadest cause.
