Ju Haknyeon deals with a public backlash despite the reasons between contractual disputes and scandal

Ju Haknyeon deals with a public backlash despite the reasons between contractual disputes and scandal

Jud Hakyonformer member of The boyHe finds herself at the center of the dispute following her alleged involvement with the Japanese AV actress Asuka Kirara and the consequent impact with her agency, Hundred. Despite his emotional appeal to the public and the denial of any illicit, public sentiment remains largely antipathic.

The scandal broke out after Ju has declared an arrest of the activities, which was later revealed to be connected to his association with Asuka Kirara, a figure known for appearances in 446 adult films. The revelation shocked the fans and the audience, causing a quick repercussions.

Hundred He announced the departure and termination of the Juje Contract on June 18, citing a violation of the contract pursuant to clause 6.3 damage to the image and dignity requested to a public figure. However, Ju claims to have not accepted to leave the group or accept the termination of the contract. In a declaration of June 20, he challenged the agency, asking for evidence of any illegal behavior and accusing them of manipulating the situation to force its exit.

Ju also revealed that it had been pushed to sign a resolution agreement that requested over 2 billion victories in compensation. Insists that the figures include a protruded reimbursement of its 1.5 billion signature bonus, with 1.23 billion in remaining victories for the dissatisfied term. The remaining 770 million victories were calculated on the basis of the profits provided for by The boyActive contracts.

The_boyz_chase_the_stealer_concept_all_group

Despite the statement of Jua to be the victim of “assassination of the character”, the public reaction was cold. Many consider the scandal related to AV harmful enough to justify his departure, regardless of legal shades.

Even his appeal on Instagram, where he described his fear of being unjustly labeled a sexual molester and his emotional unease, he was unable to reverse the tide. Critics show that, although personal suffering emphasizes the responsibility for the wider impact of the scandal on the group and fans.

Joo Hak-Nyeon The departure of Boyz Controversyportrait-Leatherjac-Necklace-Turntneck.

As Sport Chosun observed, the financial terms are located in the K-Pop sector in which early resolution generally requires the reimbursement of any portion not acquired in signature bonuses, unless otherwise established.

The growing online feeling is of fatigue with the scandals of celebrities and a request for responsibility rather than emotional appeals. The repercussing highlights the high expectations of the idols of the idols and the difficulty of recovering the trust of the public once it is broken.

Faced with the intensification of public control, Jud Hakyon’s The case underlines the fragile line between the right to defend one’s personal dignity and the responsibility that derives from being a public person. Regardless of the ultimate truth, it is clear that his image has undergone a serious blow not only because of the scandal itself, but also because of how the crisis was managed, leaving the fans who feel betrayed. With the trust already broken, the JUS The path of entertainment will be long and far from easy.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top