G-Dragon faces a renewed criticism for long-standing disputes for pets

G-Dragon faces a renewed criticism for long-standing disputes for pets

A recent post on the Korean online community PIG has reported discussions about it G-Dragon’s The property of past pets, in particular focusing on his dog, Gaho. The post claims that negative comments on G-dragon They are strategically positioned in the sections of the comments of unrelated videos, with the aim of reviving old disputes.

A recent viral video with Giselle di Aespa has an unexpectedly re-enacted controversy around G-Dragon, with many commentators who criticize him during the past accusations of neglecting his dog, Gaho, despite not being related to the video. The supporters rejected, citing defenses by professionals such as the animal behaviorist Kang Hyung-Wook and underlining that Gaho lived a long and well-kept life before dying at the end of 2023.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw4gip1qs6m

Post Post Holder

This YouTube Shorts video reached 1.25 million views and 275 comments within about 3 days of office.

The miniature and the title are both Aespa’s Giselle.

However, the video also includes the appearances of Blackpink’s Jennie and Rosé, Han so-hee, G-dragon (with his cat) and the animal of Jo Kwon.

This means that if the spectators had clicking on the video because of Giselle, it would be unnatural that the comments are overwhelmed G-dragon And for those who are the best comments from the beginning.

Yet, in the first hours following loading, the comments section was flooded with negative comments on G-dragonRecycling old voices and accusations about his dog. These comments have obtained a disproportionate number of likes compared to the counting of the initial views.

(Think about it: what are the possibilities that, at the beginning with such a low audience, hundreds of people who clicking due to a miniature of female idol would be suddenly curious G-Dragon’s dog gaho?)

This is only a portion, among the 275 comments, about half is approximately G-dragon. Over time and the opinions, of course, the highest comment changed in one that was actually relevant and fun in the context of the video increased. Of course, new hatred comments on G-dragon They are still pouring uninterruptedly.

Netizen reactions

The revised debate has divided the Netizen: some are frustrated by the recurring accusations and see them as tactics of targeted strips, while others claim that celebrities should be held responsible for the past behavior, regardless of how long it has passed.

CNG comments:

  1. Is it a shame to see someone use so much passion to hate others, why don’t they live their lives instead?
  2. Even when there is an explanation, they never listen to, muttering the same things more and more times.
  3. They must not have anything better to do and too much time available to live like this … Even calling it pathetic looks like a waste of words. ã… 
  4. Wow, do we still have to do with this forced hatred? They really don’t have to have nothing to criticize. G-Dragon always ends up being the target of the accusations invented.
  5. I always murmount the same things, it’s like listening to someone with loss of memory. I am so tired of it. Since the official notice, they stopped attacking him directly and have started to throw the shadow indirectly, but it is too obvious.

In the end, while the criticism is inevitable for public figures, the persistence of unfounded accusations even after clarifications reveals more on the reasons of the accusers than on the actions of the accused.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top