On March 14, the gold medal of the Kim Soo-Hyun agency said: “Kim Soo-Hyun and Kim Sae-Sore came out of the summer of 2019 at the autumn of 2020, after becoming an adult. The statement that Kim Sae-S’s attended when he was a minor is false.“
The agency also addressed Kim Sa-Se-Se-Se-So-Hyun messages, where he wrote, “Save me” AND “I will repay it step by step. “
The gold medal explained that he had sent proof of the content in an attempt to minimize the financial burden on the deceased, stating, “If the company arbitrarily covers the penalties of which Kim Sae-Srades is responsible, the managers who made this decision could be held responsible for violation of trust. There was also concern that spending could not be recognized as a loss of companies. Furthermore, if the amount lent to Kim Sae-Se-Sore without interest or guarantees has not been documented through adequate procedures, the managers could be accused of granting illegal benefits to a specific individual. “
The agency also developed that, during an accounting audit, they had to determine how to manage the credits relating to Kim Sae-Sign. They added, “According to the legal and accounting companies that lead the audit, if the company has canceled the amount as a negative debt without any collection effort, this would mean that the company would have renounced unilaterally to the debt of Kim Sae-See-S, causing financial damage to the company. This also raised concerns about a potential violation of the trust by the managers. “
As for this, the lawyer Lee Go-Eun appeared on Ytn News and commented, “If text messages are not built, it does not seem that the agency required an immediate refund. “
Lee further questioned, “But in reality, how can Kim Sae-Se-So be held responsible for the violation of trust unless the agency present a legal complaint? Shouldn’t the agency be the victim in a violation of the case of trust? However, unless the company itself reports or charges, it is difficult for the question of violation of the trust on the surface. “
Lee continued, “A accountant might need to press for payment and discuss the matter, but the agency claims to have sent the proof of the contents to avoid a violation of trust considering Kim Sae-Se-S. However, from a legal point of view, since a violation of the case of trust would require the agency to take legal actions, I wonder if this explanation is truly convincing. “
